238
edits
(a controversial historical compromise most of us don't/didn't know about from the mid-1970s) |
Allixpeeke (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
'''The Dallas Accord''' was a compromise between | '''The Dallas Accord''' was a compromise between moderates and radicals at the [[1974]] [[Libertarian National Convention]]. | ||
The result was | The result was that the [[1974 Libertarian Party Platform]] was not to state explicitely whether or not the state was recognized as legitimately existing. The intent of the compromise was to make the [[Libertarian Party]] a suitable home for both [[minarchism|minarchists]] (''i.e.'' libertarians who advocate a small but existing government, or what [[Robert Nozick]] would call the "night-watchman state") and [[anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalists]] (''i.e.'' libertarians who believe the [[free market]] can effectively replace all government functions). In other words, the Libertarian Party was to serve as a "big tent" party wherein both radical and moderate libertarians could work together to further their shared goal of decreasing the size, cost, and scope of government. | ||
Full adherence to this compromise | Full adherence to this compromise lasted for decades, ending in Portland in [[2006 Libertarian Party Platform|2006]] with the inclusion of the following language: "Government exists to protect the rights of every individual including life, liberty and property." This alteration was mostly the result of the efforts of the [[Libertarian Reform Caucus]], an organisation which also cut the length of the platform down to one-eighth the length it was in [[2004 Libertarian Party Platform|2004]]. | ||
edits