37
edits
National Blockchain Committee: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
added more state info
(more links added about state laws) |
(added more state info) |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|[[Connecticut Blockchain|Connecticut - CT]]<br /> | |[[Connecticut Blockchain|Connecticut - CT]]<br /> | ||
| | | | ||
| | |Connecticut "enacted 2017 legislation forbidding third parties to sell virtual currency or store virtual currency for others without a license[...and] decreed that virtual currency licensees must pay a surety bond.<ref>https://coinatmradar.com/blog/the-fifty-u-s-states-and-cryptocurrency-regulations/</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Delaware Blockchain|Delaware - DE]]<br /> | |[[Delaware Blockchain|Delaware - DE]]<br /> | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
|[[Georgia Blockchain|Georgia - GA]]<br /> | |[[Georgia Blockchain|Georgia - GA]]<br /> | ||
| | | | ||
| | |Transmission of virtual currency within the state requires a license. GA Department of Banking and Finance is authorized to create future rules and regulations involving the transmission of virtual currency.<ref>https://coinatmradar.com/blog/the-fifty-u-s-states-and-cryptocurrency-regulations/</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Hawaii Blockchain|Hawaii - HI]]<br /> | |[[Hawaii Blockchain|Hawaii - HI]]<br /> | ||
| Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
|[[New York Blockchain|New York - NY]]<br /> | |[[New York Blockchain|New York - NY]]<br /> | ||
| | | | ||
| | |A "BitLicense" from the New York State Department of Financial Services and a surety bond is required<ref>https://coinatmradar.com/blog/the-fifty-u-s-states-and-cryptocurrency-regulations/</ref> for businesses engaging in virtual currency activity, other than "merchants and consumers that utilize Virtual Currency solely for the purchase or sale of goods or services or for investment purposes" and "Persons that are chartered under the New York Banking Law and are approved by the superintendent to engage in Virtual Currency Business Activity" <ref>NY adopted law language: https://www.dfs.ny.gov/legal/regulations/adoptions/dfsp200t.pdf</ref> | ||
* 2017-2018 bill S7724 sponsored by State Sen. Luis R. Sepúlveda(D) to create a digital currency task force did not get out of committee | |||
|- | |- | ||
|[[North Carolina Blockchain|North Carolina - NC]] | |[[North Carolina Blockchain|North Carolina - NC]] | ||
| Line 232: | Line 233: | ||
|[[Wyoming Blockchain|Wyoming - WY]]<br /> | |[[Wyoming Blockchain|Wyoming - WY]]<br /> | ||
| | | | ||
|Crypto-friendly. "in addition to enacting 5 blockchain-friendly bills in 2018, 6 more bills have an elevated chance of becoming law bc they're now "committee bills"<ref>https://twitter.com/CaitlinLong_/status/1069247321546940416</ref> | |Crypto-friendly. Exempts virtual currency money transmission laws and regulation within the state; also exempts it from state property tax<ref>https://coinatmradar.com/blog/the-fifty-u-s-states-and-cryptocurrency-regulations/</ref> "in addition to enacting 5 blockchain-friendly bills in 2018, 6 more bills have an elevated chance of becoming law bc they're now "committee bills"<ref>https://twitter.com/CaitlinLong_/status/1069247321546940416</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||