Document:Libertarian Party Radical Caucus Platform 2016: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 153: Line 153:




===10. Freedom of Communication===
Draft of 'freedom of communication' plank.  


[ASSIGNED]
The First Amendment to the Constitution is meant as an acknowledgment of an inherent right, rather than a granting of rights that can be restricted or revoked for so-called necessity. The Amendment is meant to limit government interference with this natural right, rather than to confine it to a realm of 'acceptable speech'. An important corollary to the right to speech is the right to silence -- to withhold information and sources when deemed advisable by an individual or organization. 


We defend the rights of individuals to unrestricted freedom of speech, freedom of the press and the right of individuals to dissent from government itself. We recognize that full freedom of expression is possible only as part of a system of full property rights. The freedom to use one's own voice; the freedom to hire a hall; the freedom to own a printing press, a broadcasting station, or a transmission cable; the freedom to host and publish information on the Internet; the freedom to wave or burn one's own flag; and similar property-based freedoms are precisely what constitute freedom of communication. At the same time, we recognize that freedom of communication does not extend to the use of other people's property to promote one's ideas without the voluntary consent of the owners.  
We defend the rights of individuals to unrestricted freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right of individuals to unfettered  expression. We recognize that freedom of expression is possible only as part of a system of full property rights. The freedom to use one's own voice; the freedom to hire a hall; the freedom to own a printing press, a broadcasting station, or a transmission cable; the freedom to host and publish information on the Internet; the freedom to display or burn one's own flag; and similar property-based freedoms are precisely what constitute freedom of communication. At the same time, we recognize that freedom of communication does not extend to the use of other people's property to promote one's ideas without the voluntary consent of the owners.  


We oppose any abridgment of the freedom of speech through government censorship, regulation or control of communications media, including, but not limited to, laws concerning:  
We oppose any abridgment of the freedom of speech through government censorship, regulation or control of communications media, including, but not limited to, laws concerning:  
 
-- Obscenity and pornography, as we hold this to be an abridgment of liberty of expression despite claims that it instigates rape or assault, or demeans and slanders women;  
-- Obscenity, including "pornography", as we hold this to be an abridgment of liberty of expression despite claims that it instigates rape or assault, or demeans and slanders women;  
-- Reception and storage equipment, such as digital audio tape recorders and radar warning devices;  
 
-- Electronic bulletin boards, social networking and filesharing sites, communications networks, online marketplaces, and other interactive electronic media as we hold them to be the functional equivalent of speaking halls and printing presses in the age of electronic communications, and as such deserving of full freedom;  
-- Reception and storage equipment, such as digital audio tape recorders and radar warning devices, and the manufacture of video terminals by telephone companies;  
 
-- Electronic bulletin boards, communications networks, and other interactive electronic media as we hold them to be the functional equivalent of speaking halls and printing presses in the age of electronic communications, and as such deserving of full freedom;  
 
-- Electronic newspapers, electronic "Yellow Pages", file libraries, websites, and other new information media, as these deserve full freedom.
 
-- Commercial speech or advertising.  
-- Commercial speech or advertising.  


We oppose speech codes at all schools that are primarily tax funded. Language that is deemed offensive to certain groups is not a cause for legal action.  
We oppose speech codes at all schools that are primarily tax funded. Language that is deemed offensive to certain groups is not a cause for legal action.  


We favor the abolition of the Federal Communications Commission as we would provide for free market ownership of airwave frequencies, deserving of full First Amendment protection.  
We call for the abolition of the Federal Communications Commission as we would provide for market ownership of broadcast spectra.


We oppose government ownership or subsidy of, or funding for, any communications organization.  
We oppose government ownership or subsidy of, or funding for, any communications organization.  


We strongly oppose the government's burgeoning practice of invading newsrooms, or the premises of other innocent third parties, in the name of law enforcement. We further oppose court orders gagging news coverage of criminal proceedings -- the right to publish and broadcast must not be abridged merely for the convenience of the judicial system. We deplore any efforts to impose thought control on the media, either by the use of anti-trust laws, or by any other government action in the name of stopping "bias."
We support the right to individual and group privacy via encryption, and oppose any government efforts to restrict encryption development or deployment.
 
We strongly oppose the government's burgeoning practice of invading newsrooms, or the premises of other innocent parties, in the name of law enforcement. We further oppose court orders gagging news coverage of criminal proceedings -- the right to publish and broadcast must not be abridged merely for the convenience of the judicial system. Members of the media should not have any special protections not available to everyone, including the right not to reveal sources to investigators or courts.  


Removal of all of these regulations and practices throughout the communications media would open the way to diversity and innovation. We shall not be satisfied until the First Amendment is expanded to protect full, unconditional freedom of communication.
Removal of all of these regulations and practices throughout the communications media would open the way to diversity and innovation. We shall not be satisfied until the First Amendment is acknowledged to provide  full, unconditional freedom of communication.


===11. Freedom of Religion===
===11. Freedom of Religion===
Anonymous user

Navigation menu