Libertarian Party US Presidential Election Results: Difference between revisions

From LPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 64: Line 64:
|-
|-
| [[Alaska Libertarian Party|Alaska]]
| [[Alaska Libertarian Party|Alaska]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|68<br>0.07%
| align=right|6,785<br>5.49%
| align=right|6,785<br>5.49%
| align=right|18,479<br>11.66%
| align=right|18,479<br>11.66%
Line 105: Line 105:
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|980 <br>0.01%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|980 <br>0.01%
| align=right|56,388<br>0.72%
| align=right|56,388<br>0.72%
| align=right|148,434<br>1.73%
| align=right|148,390<br>1.73%
| align=right|49,951<br>0.53%
| align=right|49,951<br>0.53%
| align=right|70,105<br>0.71%
| align=right|70,105<br>0.71%
Line 117: Line 117:
| [[Libertarian Party of Colorado|Colorado]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Colorado|Colorado]]
| align=right|1,111<br>0.12%
| align=right|1,111<br>0.12%
| align=right|5,330<br>0.49%
| align=right|5,338<br>0.49%
| align=right|25,744<br>2.17%
| align=right|25,744<br>2.17%
| align=right|11,257<br>0.87%
| align=right|11,257<br>0.87%
Line 124: Line 124:
| align=right|12,392<br>0.82%
| align=right|12,392<br>0.82%
| align=right|12,799<br>0.73%
| align=right|12,799<br>0.73%
| align=right|7,665<br>0.36%
| align=right|7,664<br>0.36%
| align=right|10,898<br>0.45%
| align=right|10,898<br>0.45%
| align=right|35,545<br>1.38%
| align=right|35,545<br>1.38%
|-
|-
| [[Libertarian Party of Connecticut|Connecticut]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Connecticut|Connecticut]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|10<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|209<br>0.02%
| align=right|8,570<br>0.61%
| align=right|8,570<br>0.61%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|204<br>0.01%
| align=right|14,071<br>0.97%
| align=right|14,071<br>0.97%
| align=right|5,391<br>0.33%
| align=right|5,391<br>0.33%
Line 143: Line 143:
| [[Libertarian Party of Delaware|Delaware]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Delaware|Delaware]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|34<br>0.01%
| align=right|1,974<br>0.84%
| align=right|1,974<br>0.84%
| align=right|268<br>0.11%
| align=right|268<br>0.11%
Line 168: Line 168:
|-
|-
| [[Libertarian Party of Florida|Florida]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Florida|Florida]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|4<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|103<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|103<br>0.00%
| align=right|30,524<br>0.83%
| align=right|30,524<br>0.83%
Line 181: Line 181:
|-
|-
| [[Libertarian Party of Georgia|Georgia]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Georgia|Georgia]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|14<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|175<br>0.01%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|175<br>0.01%
| align=right|15,627<br>0.98%
| align=right|15,627<br>0.98%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|151<br>0.01%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|159<br>0.01%
| align=right|8,435<br>0.47%
| align=right|8,435<br>0.47%
| align=right|7,110<br>0.31%
| align=right|7,110<br>0.31%
Line 247: Line 247:
| [[Libertarian Party of Iowa|Iowa]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Iowa|Iowa]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|1,452<br>0.11%
| align=right|1,454<br>0.11%
| align=right|13,123<br>1.00%
| align=right|13,123<br>1.00%
| align=right|1,844<br>0.14%
| align=right|1,844<br>0.14%
Line 275: Line 275:
| align=right|814<br>0.07%
| align=right|814<br>0.07%
| align=right|5,531<br>0.43%
| align=right|5,531<br>0.43%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|3<br>0.00%
| align=right|2,118<br>0.16%
| align=right|2,118<br>0.16%
| align=right|4,513<br>0.30%
| align=right|4,513<br>0.30%
Line 286: Line 286:
| [[Libertarian Party of Louisiana|Louisiana]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Louisiana|Louisiana]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|3,325<br>0.26%
| align=right|3,134<br>0.25%
| align=right|8,240<br>0.53%
| align=right|8,240<br>0.53%
| align=right|1,876<br>0.11%
| align=right|1,876<br>0.11%
Line 299: Line 299:
| [[Libertarian Party of Maine|Maine]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Maine|Maine]]
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|1<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|1<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|10<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|12<br>0.00%
| align=right|5,119<br>0.98%
| align=right|5,119<br>0.98%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|3<br>0.00%
| align=right|2,700<br>0.49%
| align=right|2,700<br>0.49%
| align=right|1,681<br>0.25%
| align=right|1,681<br>0.25%
Line 312: Line 312:
| [[Libertarian Party of Maryland|Maryland]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Maryland|Maryland]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|255<br>0.02%
| align=right|14,192<br>0.92%
| align=right|14,192<br>0.92%
| align=right|5,721<br>0.34%
| align=right|5,721<br>0.34%
Line 338: Line 338:
| [[Libertarian Party of Michigan|Michigan]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Michigan|Michigan]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|5,406<br>0.15%
| align=right|5,407<br>0.15%
| align=right|41,597<br>1.06%
| align=right|41,597<br>1.06%
| align=right|10,055<br>0.26%
| align=right|10,055<br>0.26%
Line 352: Line 352:
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|3,529<br>0.18%
| align=right|3,529<br>0.18%
| align=right|31,592<br>1.54%
| align=right|31,593<br>1.54%
| align=right|2,996<br>0.14%
| align=right|2,996<br>0.14%
| align=right|5,109<br>0.24%
| align=right|5,109<br>0.24%
Line 364: Line 364:
| [[Libertarian Party of Mississippi|Mississippi]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Mississippi|Mississippi]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|2,787<br>0.36%
| align=right|2,606<br>0.34%
| align=right|5,465<br>0.61%
| align=right|4,702<br>0.53%
| align=right|2,336<br>0.25%
| align=right|2,336<br>0.25%
| align=right|3,329<br>0.36%
| align=right|3,329<br>0.36%
Line 376: Line 376:
|-
|-
| [[Missouri Libertarian Party|Missouri]]
| [[Missouri Libertarian Party|Missouri]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|9<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|179<br>0.01%
| align=right|14,422<br>0.69%
| align=right|14,422<br>0.69%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
Line 390: Line 390:
| [[Montana Libertarian Party|Montana]]
| [[Montana Libertarian Party|Montana]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|40<br>0.01%
| align=right|9,825<br>2.70%
| align=right|9,825<br>2.70%
| align=right|5,185<br>1.35%
| align=right|5,185<br>1.35%
Line 403: Line 403:
| [[Libertarian Party of Nebraska|Nebraska]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Nebraska|Nebraska]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|1,482<br>0.24%
| align=right|1,476<br>0.24%
| align=right|9,073<br>1.42%
| align=right|9,041<br>1.41%
| align=right|2,079<br>0.32%
| align=right|2,079<br>0.32%
| align=right|2,534<br>0.38%
| align=right|2,534<br>0.38%
Line 417: Line 417:
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|1,519<br>0.75%
| align=right|1,519<br>0.75%
| align=right|4,358<br>1.76%
| align=right|4,358<br>1.79%
| align=right|2,292<br>0.80%
| align=right|2,292<br>0.80%
| align=right|3,520<br>1.01%
| align=right|3,520<br>1.01%
Line 430: Line 430:
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|936<br>0.28%
| align=right|936<br>0.28%
| align=right|2,067<br>0.54%
| align=right|2,064<br>0.54%
| align=right|735<br>0.19%
| align=right|735<br>0.19%
| align=right|4,502<br>1.00%
| align=right|4,502<br>1.00%
Line 467: Line 467:
|-
|-
| [[Libertarian Party of New York|New York]]
| [[Libertarian Party of New York|New York]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|6<br>0.00%
| align=right|12,197<br>0.19%
| align=right|12,197<br>0.19%
| align=right|52,648<br>0.85%
| align=right|52,648<br>0.85%
Line 507: Line 507:
| [[Libertarian Party of Ohio|Ohio]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Ohio|Ohio]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|8,961<br>0.22%
| align=right|8,952<br>0.22%
| align=right|49,033<br>1.14%
| align=right|49,033<br>1.14%
| align=right|5,886<br>0.13%
| align=right|5,886<br>0.13%
Line 532: Line 532:
|-
|-
| [[Libertarian Party of Oregon|Oregon]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Oregon|Oregon]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|61<br>0.01%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|464<br>0.05%
| align=right|25,838<br>2.19%
| align=right|25,838<br>2.19%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|376<br>0.03%
| align=right|14,811<br>1.23%
| align=right|14,811<br>1.23%
| align=right|4,277<br>0.29%
| align=right|4,277<br>0.29%
Line 545: Line 545:
|-
|-
| [[Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania|Pennsylvania]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania|Pennsylvania]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|8<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|73<br>0.00%
| align=right|33,263<br>0.73%
| align=right|33,263<br>0.73%
| align=right|6,982<br>0.14%
| align=right|6,982<br>0.14%
Line 572: Line 572:
| [[South Carolina Libertarian Party|South Carolina]]
| [[South Carolina Libertarian Party|South Carolina]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|53<br>0.01%
| align=right|4,975<br>0.56%
| align=right|4,807<br>0.54%
| align=right|4,359<br>0.45%
| align=right|4,359<br>0.45%
| align=right|4,935<br>0.50%
| align=right|4,935<br>0.50%
Line 597: Line 597:
|-
|-
| [[Libertarian Party of Tennessee|Tennessee]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Tennessee|Tennessee]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|1<br>0.00%
| align=right|1,375<br>0.09%
| align=right|1,375<br>0.09%
| align=right|7,116<br>0.44%
| align=right|7,116<br>0.44%
Line 605: Line 605:
| align=right|5,020<br>0.27%
| align=right|5,020<br>0.27%
| align=right|4,284<br>0.21%
| align=right|4,284<br>0.21%
| align=right|4,865<br>0.20%
| align=right|4,866<br>0.20%
| align=right|8,547<br>0.33%
| align=right|8,547<br>0.33%
| align=right|18,623<br>0.76%
| align=right|18,623<br>0.76%
|-
|-
| [[Libertarian Party of Texas|Texas]]
| [[Libertarian Party of Texas|Texas]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|52<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|263<br>0.01%
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|575<br>0.01%
| align=right|37,643<br>0.83%
| align=right|37,643<br>0.83%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
Line 625: Line 625:
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| align=right|2,438<br>0.45%
| align=right|2,438<br>0.45%
| align=right|7,226<br>1.20%
| align=right|7,156<br>1.18%
| align=right|2,447<br>0.39%
| align=right|2,447<br>0.39%
| align=right|7,473<br>1.16%
| align=right|7,473<br>1.16%
Line 676: Line 676:
| [[Libertarian Party of West Virginia|West Virginia]]
| [[Libertarian Party of West Virginia|West Virginia]]
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|17<br>0.00%
| align=right|4,356<br>0.59%
| align=right|4,356<br>0.59%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|6<br>0.00%
| style="background: #EE2222;"|
| style="background: #EEEE88;" align="right"|28<br>0.00%
| align=right|1,873<br>0.27%
| align=right|1,873<br>0.27%
| align=right|3,062<br>0.48%
| align=right|3,062<br>0.48%
Line 714: Line 714:
|-
|-
| Total
| Total
| align=right|3,674<br>0.00%
| align=right|3,907<br>0.01%
| align=right|172,557<br>0.21%
| align=right|173,819<br>0.21%
| align=right|921,128<br>1.06%
| align=right|920,049<br>1.06%
| align=right|228,109<br>0.25%
| align=right|228,709<br>0.25%
| align=right|432,179<br>0.47%
| align=right|432,207<br>0.47%
| align=right|291,627<br>0.28%
| align=right|291,627<br>0.28%
| align=right|485,798<br>0.50%
| align=right|485,798<br>0.50%
| align=right|*390,206<br>0.36%
| align=right|*390,206<br>0.37%
| align=right|397,265<br>0.32%
| align=right|397,265<br>0.32%
| align=right|523,715<br>0.40%
| align=right|523,715<br>0.40%

Revision as of 03:33, 16 August 2016

History

Since 1972, there have been 10 Libertarian Presidential Nominees. The most successful in terms of percent of votes and number of votes was Ed Clark in 1980. In 1972, John Hospers received the first and only electoral vote in the party's history when one faithless elector voted for him.

1972 Presidential Election

In 1972, the Libertarian Party was barely organized and was still in its infant stage. The Presidential Nominee was John Hospers. The Vice Presidential Nominee was Tonie Nathan. The ticket was only on the ballot in 2 states and received one electoral vote from a faithless elector in Virginia.

1976 Presidential Election

By 1976, the party had started to organize and was able to mount a more solid campaign for president. The nominee was Roger MacBride, the same faithless elector who voted for John Hospers in the last election. The Vice Presidential Nominee was David Bergland. The pair managed to gain ballot access in 32 states and was able to gain more than 100,000 votes, a milestone for the relatively new political party.

1980 Presidential Election

The 1980 Presidential Election was another major milestone for the Libertarian Party. The Party nominated Ed Clark for President and David Koch for Vice President. The campaign was largely self financed and was able to run several national television advertisements. The ticket gained ballot access in all 50 states. In Alaska, the ticket gained 11.66% of the vote.

1984 Presidential Election

At the 1984 National Convention, many Libertarians walked out, leading many to suspect the end of the party was near. As a result of the walkout, David Bergland was nominated for President and Jim Lewis was nominated for Vice President. The ticket had ballot access in 36 states.

1988 Presidential Election

Former Congressman Ron Paul was the Presidential Nominee for 1988 and Andre Marrou was the Vice Presidential Nominee. The campaign raised over $2,000,000 and was on the ballot in 46 states.

1992 Presidential Election

For the 1992 Election, Andre Marrou was nominated as the Presidential Candidate. Marrou was known for being one of the few libertarian elected to a state legislature and as the Vice Presidential Candidate in 1988. Nancy Lord was nominated as the Vice Presidential Candidate. The ticket gained ballot access in all 50 states.

1996 Presidential Election

Harry Browne was the Presidential Nominee in 1996 and his running mate was Jo Jorgensen. Due to the personal wealth of both men, the campaign was able to get on the ballot in all 50 states.

2000 Presidential Election

Harry Browne was re-nominated as the Presidential Nominee in 2000 but chose Art Olivier as his running mate. The campaign had some controversy surrounding it after the National Director was found to have worked on the campaign in 1996 before Harry Browne's candidacy had been decided. The campaign nearly got on the ballot in all 50 states again but a split with the Arizona Chapter caused Harry Browne to be replaced on the ticket with another Libertarian.

2004 Presidential Election

At the 2004 Convention, the Presidential Nomination Election was very close. The race was between Michael Badnarik, Gary Nolan, and Aaron Russo. All three candidates were within 2% of each other for the first two ballots. However, Michael Badnarik made a surprising comeback and won the nomination. In a separate nomination, Richard Campagna was chosen as the vice presidential nominee. During the election cycle, Badnarik raised over $1,000,000 and ran national television ads on CNN and Fox news. The ticket gained ballot access in 48 states but didn't gain access in New Hampshire or Oklahoma.

2008 Presidential Election

Bob Barr was nominated as the Presidential Nominee in 2008 with Wayne Allyn Root nominated as the Vice Presidential Candidate. The Barr campaign was expected to do very well but due to several factors such as Sarah Palin's nomination as McCain's VP, Ron Paul's dropping of his endorsement of Barr, and the campaign's lack of advertising. The campaign still raised nearly $1.4 million dollars but didn't get as many votes as many Libertarian Leaders felt it could have. The ticket was on the ballot in 44 states.

Results by state and candidate

1972
John Hospers /
Theodora Nathan
1976
Roger MacBride /
David Bergland
1980
Ed Clark /
David Koch
1984
David Bergland /
James Lewis
1988
Ron Paul /
Andre Marrou
1992
Andre Marrou /
Nancy Lord
1996
Harry Browne /
Jo Jorgensen
2000
Harry Browne /
Art Olivier
2004
Michael Badnarik /
Richard Campagna
2008
Bob Barr /
Wayne Allyn Root
2012
Gary Johnson /
Jim Gray
Alabama 1,481
0.13%
13,318
0.99%
9,504
0.66%
8,460
0.61%
5,737
0.34%
5,290
0.34%
5,893
0.35%
3,529
0.19%
4,991
0.24%
12,328
0.59%
Alaska 68
0.07%
6,785
5.49%
18,479
11.66%
6,378
3.07%
5,484
2.74%
1,378
0.53%
2,276
0.94%
2,636
0.92%
1,675
0.54%
1,589
0.49%
7,392
2.46%
Arizona 7,647
1.03%
18,784
2.15%
10,585
1.03%
13,351
1.14%
6,759
0.46%
14,358
1.02%
*5,775
0.38%
11,856
0.59%
12,555
0.55%
32,100
1.39%
Arkansas 8,970
1.07%
2,221
0.25%
3,297
0.40%
1,261
0.13%
3,076
0.35%
2,781
0.30%
2,352
0.22%
4,776
0.44%
16,276
1.52%
California 980
0.01%
56,388
0.72%
148,390
1.73%
49,951
0.53%
70,105
0.71%
48,139
0.43%
73,600
0.73%
45,520
0.42%
50,165
0.40%
67,582
0.50%
143,221
1.10%
Colorado 1,111
0.12%
5,338
0.49%
25,744
2.17%
11,257
0.87%
15,482
1.13%
8,669
0.55%
12,392
0.82%
12,799
0.73%
7,664
0.36%
10,898
0.45%
35,545
1.38%
Connecticut 10
0.00%
209
0.02%
8,570
0.61%
204
0.01%
14,071
0.97%
5,391
0.33%
5,788
0.42%
3,484
0.24%
3,367
0.21%
12,580
0.81%
Delaware 34
0.01%
1,974
0.84%
268
0.11%
1,162
0.47%
935
0.32%
2,052
0.76%
774
0.24%
586
0.16%
1,109
0.27%
3,882
0.94%
D. C. 274
0.16%
1,104
0.63%
279
0.13%
554
0.29%
467
0.21%
588
0.32%
669
0.33%
502
0.22%
2,083
0.71%
Florida 4
0.00%
103
0.00%
30,524
0.83%
754
0.02%
19,796
0.46%
15,079
0.28%
23,965
0.45%
16,415
0.28%
11,996
0.16%
17,218
0.21%
44,726
0.53%
Georgia 14
0.00%
175
0.01%
15,627
0.98%
159
0.01%
8,435
0.47%
7,110
0.31%
17,870
0.78%
36,332
1.40%
18,387
0.56%
28,731
0.73%
45,324
1.16%
Hawaii 3,923
1.35%
3,269
1.08%
2,167
0.65%
1,999
0.56%
1,119
0.30%
2,493
0.69%
1,477
0.40%
1,377
0.32%
1,314
0.29%
3,840
0.88%
Idaho 3,558
1.04%
8,425
1.93%
2,823
0.69%
5,313
1.30%
1,167
0.24%
3,325
0.68%
3,488
0.70%
3,844
0.64%
3,658
0.56%
9,453
1.45%
Illinois 8,057
0.17%
38,939
0.82%
10,086
0.21%
14,944
0.33%
9,218
0.18%
22,548
0.52%
11,623
0.25%
32,442
0.62%
19,642
0.36%
56,229
1.07%
Indiana 19,627
0.88%
6,741
0.30%
7,936
0.34%
15,632
0.73%
15,530
0.71%
18,058
0.73%
29,257
1.06%
50,111
1.91%
Iowa 1,454
0.11%
13,123
1.00%
1,844
0.14%
2,494
0.20%
1,076
0.08%
2,315
0.19%
3,209
0.24%
2,992
0.20%
4,590
0.30%
12,926
0.82%
Kansas 3,242
0.34%
14,470
1.48%
3,329
0.33%
12,553
1.26%
4,314
0.37%
4,557
0.42%
4,525
0.42%
4,013
0.34%
6,706
0.54%
20,456
1.76%
Kentucky 814
0.07%
5,531
0.43%
3
0.00%
2,118
0.16%
4,513
0.30%
4,009
0.29%
2,896
0.19%
2,619
0.15%
5,989
0.33%
17,063
0.95%
Louisiana 3,134
0.25%
8,240
0.53%
1,876
0.11%
4,115
0.25%
3,155
0.18%
7,499
0.42%
2,951
0.17%
2,781
0.14%
18,157
0.91%
Maine 1
0.00%
12
0.00%
5,119
0.98%
3
0.00%
2,700
0.49%
1,681
0.25%
2,996
0.49%
3,074
0.47%
1,965
0.27%
251
0.03%
9,352
1.31%
Maryland 255
0.02%
14,192
0.92%
5,721
0.34%
6,748
0.39%
4,715
0.24%
8,765
0.49%
5,310
0.26%
6,094
0.26%
9,842
0.37%
30,195
1.12%
Massachusetts 43
0.00%
135
0.01%
22,038
0.87%
24,251
0.92%
9,021
0.32%
20,426
0.80%
16,366
0.61%
15,022
0.52%
13,189
0.43%
30,920
0.98%
Michigan 5,407
0.15%
41,597
1.06%
10,055
0.26%
18,336
0.50%
10,175
0.24%
27,670
0.72%
16,711
0.39%
10,552
0.22%
23,716
0.47%
7,774
0.16%
Minnesota 3,529
0.18%
31,593
1.54%
2,996
0.14%
5,109
0.24%
3,374
0.14%
8,271
0.38%
5,282
0.22%
4,639
0.16%
9,174
0.32%
35,098
1.20%
Mississippi 2,606
0.34%
4,702
0.53%
2,336
0.25%
3,329
0.36%
2,154
0.22%
2,809
0.31%
2,009
0.20%
1,793
0.16%
2,529
0.20%
6,676
0.52%
Missouri 9
0.00%
179
0.01%
14,422
0.69%
434
0.02%
7,497
0.31%
10,522
0.49%
7,436
0.32%
9,831
0.36%
11,386
0.39%
43,151
1.56%
Montana 40
0.01%
9,825
2.70%
5,185
1.35%
5,047
1.38%
986
0.24%
2,526
0.62%
1,718
0.42%
1,733
0.38%
1,355
0.28%
14,165
2.93%
Nebraska 1,476
0.24%
9,041
1.41%
2,079
0.32%
2,534
0.38%
1,344
0.18%
2,792
0.41%
2,245
0.32%
2,041
0.26%
2,740
0.34%
11,109
1.40%
Nevada 1,519
0.75%
4,358
1.79%
2,292
0.80%
3,520
1.01%
1,835
0.36%
4,460
0.96%
3,311
0.54%
3,176
0.38%
4,263
0.44%
10,968
1.08%
New Hampshire 936
0.28%
2,064
0.54%
735
0.19%
4,502
1.00%
3,548
0.66%
4,237
0.85%
2,757
0.48%
372
0.05%
2,217
0.31%
8,212
1.16%
New Jersey 9,449
0.31%
20,652
069%
6,416
0.20%
8,421
0.27%
6,822
0.20%
14,763
0.48%
6,312
0.20%
4,514
0.12%
8,441
0.22%
21,045
0.58%
New Mexico 1,110
0.27%
4,365
0.96%
4,459
0.87%
3,268
0.63%
1,615
0.28%
2,996
0.54%
2,058
0.34%
2,382
0.31%
2,428
0.29%
27,788
3.55%
New York 6
0.00%
12,197
0.19%
52,648
0.85%
11,949
0.18%
12,109
0.19%
13,451
0.19%
12,220
0.19%
7,649
0.11%
11,607
0.16%
19,596
0.26%
47,256
0.67%
North Carolina 2,219
0.13%
9,677
0.52%
3,794
0.17%
1,263
0.06%
5,171
0.20%
8,740
0.35%
12,307
0.42%
11,731
0.34%
25,722
0.60%
44,515
0.99%
North Dakota 256
0.09%
3,743
1.24%
703
0.23%
1,315
0.44%
416
0.14%
847
0.32%
660
0.23%
851
0.27%
1,354
0.43%
5,231
1.62%
Ohio 8,952
0.22%
49,033
1.14%
5,886
0.13%
11,989
0.27%
7,252
0.15%
12,851
0.28%
13,475
0.29%
14,676
0.26%
19,917
0.35%
49,493
0.89%
Oklahoma 13,828
1.20%
9,066
0.72%
6,261
0.53%
4,486
0.32%
5,505
0.46%
6,602
0.53%
Oregon 61
0.01%
464
0.05%
25,838
2.19%
376
0.03%
14,811
1.23%
4,277
0.29%
8,903
0.65%
7,447
0.49%
7,260
0.40%
7,635
0.42%
24,089
1.35%
Pennsylvania 8
0.00%
73
0.00%
33,263
0.73%
6,982
0.14%
12,051
0.27%
21,477
0.43%
28,000
0.62%
11,248
0.23%
21,185
0.37%
19,912
0.33%
49,991
0.87%
Rhode Island 2
0.00%
715
0.17%
2,458
0.59%
277
0.07%
825
0.20%
571
0.13%
1,109
0.28%
742
0.18%
907
0.21%
1,382
0.29%
4,388
0.98%
South Carolina 53
0.01%
4,807
0.54%
4,359
0.45%
4,935
0.50%
2,719
0.23%
4,271
0.37%
4,876
0.35%
3,608
0.22%
7,283
0.38%
16,321
0.83%
South Dakota 1,619
0.54%
3,824
1.17%
1,060
0.34%
814
0.24%
1,472
0.45%
1,662
0.53%
964
0.25%
1,835
0.48%
5,795
1.59%
Tennessee 1
0.00%
1,375
0.09%
7,116
0.44%
3,072
0.18%
2,041
0.12%
1,847
0.09%
5,020
0.27%
4,284
0.21%
4,866
0.20%
8,547
0.33%
18,623
0.76%
Texas 52
0.00%
575
0.01%
37,643
0.83%
30,355
0.56%
19,699
0.32%
20,256
0.36%
23,160
0.36%
38,787
0.52%
56,116
0.69%
88,580
1.11%
Utah 2,438
0.45%
7,156
1.18%
2,447
0.39%
7,473
1.16%
1,900
0.26%
4,129
0.62%
3,616
0.47%
3,375
0.36%
6,966
0.73%
12,572
1.24%
Vermont 4
0.00%
1,900
0.89%
1,002
0.43%
1,000
0.41%
501
0.17%
1,183
0.46%
784
0.27%
1,102
0.35%
1,067
0.33%
3,487
1.17%
Virginia 4,648
0.27%
12,821
0.69%
8,336
0.38%
5,730
0.22%
9,174
0.38%
15,198
0.55%
11,032
0.34%
11,067
0.30%
31,216
0.81%
Washington 1,537
0.10%
5,042
0.32%
29,213
1.68%
8,844
0.47%
17,240
0.92%
7,533
0.33%
12,522
0.56%
13,135
0.53%
11,955
0.42%
12,728
0.42%
42,202
1.35%
West Virginia 17
0.00%
4,356
0.59%
6
0.00%
28
0.00%
1,873
0.27%
3,062
0.48%
1,912
0.30%
1,405
0.19%
6,302
0.94%
Wisconsin 3,814
0.18%
29,135
1.28%
4,883
0.22%
5,157
0.24%
2,877
0.11%
7,929
0.36%
6,640
0.26%
6,464
0.22%
8,858
0.30%
20,439
0.67%
Wyoming 89
0.06%
4,514
2.55%
2,357
1.25%
2,026
1.15%
844
0.42%
1,739
0.82%
1,443
0.66%
1,171
0.48%
1,594
0.63%
5,326
2.14%
Total 3,907
0.01%
173,819
0.21%
920,049
1.06%
228,709
0.25%
432,207
0.47%
291,627
0.28%
485,798
0.50%
*390,206
0.37%
397,265
0.32%
523,715
0.40%
1,275,971
0.99%
No Ballot Access Write In
  • L Neil Smith was listed as the Libertarian candidate on the ballot in Arizona in place of Harry Browne in 2000. The total includes votes for L Neil Smith.