Judicial Committee (2020-2022): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Background: correct spelling of Nanna's name and other changes
(→‎Background: correct spelling of Nanna's name and other changes)
Line 17: Line 17:
===Background===
===Background===


At the [[LNC Meeting 4-5 September 2021|September 4-5, 2021 meeting]] of the Libertarian National Committee, [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] was suspended from her position as Secretary of the national Libertarian Party by a vote of 11-2 with one abstention. Voting "Yes": [[Erin Adams]], [[Whitney Bilyeu]], [[Laura Ebke]], [[Tim Ferreira|TJ Ferreira]], [[Tim Hagan]], [[Susan Hogarth]], [[Chris Luchini]], [[John Phillips]], [[Richard Longstreth]], [[Valerie Sarwark]], and [[David Sexton]]. Voting "No": [[Rich Bowen]] and [[Dustin Nanna]]. [[Ken Moellman]] abstained. Absent: [[Erik Raudsep]] and [[Joshua Smith]] who were both confirmed "no" or "abstain" votes. A controversy arose when alternate [[David Sexton]] showed up after the departure of [[Steven Nekhaila]] who was a confirmed "no" or "abstain" vote without notifying Mr. Nekhaila that he intended to do same.  If Mr. Sexton had not appeared, the motion would have failed.  Supporters of the motion state that this was perfectly acceptable.  Caryn Ann states that it was certainly legal but characterized it as "trickery." [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HApE36cvexk Meeting video is located here].  Caryn Ann appealed her suspension on the following grounds:
At the [[LNC Meeting 4-5 September 2021|September 4-5, 2021 meeting]] of the Libertarian National Committee, [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] was suspended from her position as Secretary of the national Libertarian Party by a vote of 11-2 with one abstention. Voting "Yes": [[Erin Adams]], [[Whitney Bilyeu]], [[Laura Ebke]], [[Tim Ferreira|TJ Ferreira]], [[Tim Hagan]], [[Susan Hogarth]], [[Chris Luchini]], [[John Phillips]], [[Richard Longstreth]], [[Valerie Sarwark]], and [[David Sexton]]. Voting "No": [[Rich Bowen]] and [[Dustin Nanna]]. [[Ken Moellman]] abstained. Absent: [[Erik Raudsep]] and [[Joshua Smith]] who were both confirmed "no" or "abstain" votes (though as the vote required two-thirds of the entire LNC, rather than two-thirds of those present and voting, it would not have changed the outcome if they were present.) A controversy arose when alternate [[David Sexton]] showed up after the departure of [[Steven Nekhaila]] who was a confirmed "no" or "abstain" vote without notifying Mr. Nekhaila that he intended to do same.  If Mr. Sexton had not appeared, the motion would have failed.  Supporters of the motion state that this was perfectly acceptable.  Caryn Ann states that it was certainly legal but characterized it as "trickery." [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HApE36cvexk Meeting video is located here].  Caryn Ann appealed her suspension on the following grounds:
*Failure to provide adequate due process
*Failure to provide adequate due process
*Failure to provide evidence of action that rises to the level of a removable offense
*Failure to provide evidence of action that rises to the level of a removable offense
Line 33: Line 33:
===Request for Settlement Prior to Ruling===
===Request for Settlement Prior to Ruling===


Judicial Committee Chair [[Mary Ruwart]] with great feeling asked the parties to resolve this between themselves prior to the JC releasing a decision.  To that end, [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] wrote to Party chair [[Whitney Bilyeu]] right as the hearing ended and did not receive a response.  She then reached out to [[Steven Nekhaila]], [[Rich Bowen]], [[Erik Raudsep]], [[Joshua Smith]], [[Dustin Nannan]], and [[Ken Moellman]] and hammered out a compromise motion which was presented to the LNC.  It was ruled out of order multiple times for procedural reasons with people disagreeing on whether or not the reasons were sound or designed to kill the motions.  [[Susan Hogarth]] raised a point of order the first time the motions were presented but did not re-submit the point of order on subsequent introductions.  [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] and the LNC sponsors have made it clear that the compromise motions were made due to the Ruwart request and for the good of the Party.  [[Chris Luchini]] indicated that he would only accept a compromise that involved Harlos resigning and going away, and he would "let" her keep her committee seats.  Virtually no one responded positively to that suggestion though those discussions were in private and not on the business discussion list.
Judicial Committee Chair [[Mary Ruwart]] with great feeling asked the parties to resolve this between themselves prior to the JC releasing a decision.  To that end, [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] wrote to Party chair [[Whitney Bilyeu]] right as the hearing ended and did not receive a response.  She then reached out to [[Steven Nekhaila]], [[Rich Bowen]], [[Erik Raudsep]], [[Joshua Smith]], [[Dustin Nanna]], and [[Ken Moellman]] and hammered out a compromise motion which was presented to the LNC.  It was ruled out of order multiple times for procedural reasons with people disagreeing on whether or not the reasons were sound or designed to kill the motions.  [[Susan Hogarth]] raised a point of order the first time the motions were presented but did not re-submit the point of order on subsequent introductions.  [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] and the LNC sponsors have made it clear that the compromise motions were made due to the Ruwart request and for the good of the Party.  [[Chris Luchini]] indicated that he would only accept a compromise that involved Harlos resigning and going away, and he would "let" her keep her committee seats.  Virtually no one responded positively to that suggestion though those discussions were in private and not on the business discussion list.




19

edits

Navigation menu