Document:LP News 1973 January-February Issue 12: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 191: Line 191:
The following statement has been submitted by [[Paul Hodgson]]:
The following statement has been submitted by [[Paul Hodgson]]:


"The ExecComm motion for a latter to [[Ayn Rand]] called for a 'reply to her recent criticism and attacks on the LP', and specified the questions of: (a) 'prematurity' of political action, (b) LP opposition to RMN, and (c) validity of LP principles and objectives; and of whether she would reconsider supporting our effort to provide a principled alternative to statism while;e there is still time.
"The ExecComm motion for a latter to [[Ayn Rand]] called for a 'reply to her recent criticism and attacks on the LP', and specified the questions of: (a) 'prematurity' of political action, (b) LP opposition to RMN, and (c) validity of LP principles and objectives; and of whether she would reconsider supporting our effort to provide a principled alternative to statism while there is still time.


"I don't propose to 'point out her inconsistencies in endorsing Nixon' (per se) or to ask her 'to explain her position' (cf. last Newsletter).  That would be an exercise in futility; I hardly expect her to even read the letter which I have drafted it it is sent.  It is a statement for the record."
"I don't propose to 'point out her inconsistencies in endorsing Nixon' (per se) or to ask her 'to explain her position' (cf. last Newsletter).  That would be an exercise in futility; I hardly expect her to even read the letter which I have drafted it it is sent.  It is a statement for the record."

Navigation menu