Libertarianism: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
fixing a wikilink; adding rewrite tag
No edit summary
(fixing a wikilink; adding rewrite tag)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikipedia}}
{{Wikipedia}}
{{Cleanup}}
{{Cleanup}}
 
{{WP Rewrite}}


'''Libertarianism''' is a [[political philosophy]] advocating that individuals should be free to do whatever they wish with their [[individual rights|person]] or [[property rights|property]], as long as they do not infringe on the same liberty of others. Libertarians hold as a fundamental maxim that all human interaction should be voluntary and consensual. They maintain that the initiation (or threat) of physical force against another [[individual rights|person]] or his [[property rights|property]], or the commission of [[fraud]], is a violation of that principle. Some libertarians regard ''all'' initiation of force as immoral, whereas others support a limited government that engages in the minimum amount of initiatory force (such as minimal taxation and regulation) that they believe necessary to ensure maximum individual freedom. Force is not opposed when used in retaliation for initiatory aggressions such as trespassing or violence. Libertarians favor an ethic of self-responsibility and strongly oppose the [[welfare state]], because they believe ''forcing'' someone to provide aid to others is ethically wrong, ultimately counter-productive, or both.
'''Libertarianism''' is a [[political philosophy]] advocating that individuals should be free to do whatever they wish with their [[individual rights|person]] or [[property rights|property]], as long as they do not infringe on the same liberty of others. Libertarians hold as a fundamental maxim that all human interaction should be voluntary and consensual. They maintain that the initiation (or threat) of physical force against another [[individual rights|person]] or his [[property rights|property]], or the commission of [[fraud]], is a violation of that principle. Some libertarians regard ''all'' initiation of force as immoral, whereas others support a limited government that engages in the minimum amount of initiatory force (such as minimal taxation and regulation) that they believe necessary to ensure maximum individual freedom. Force is not opposed when used in retaliation for initiatory aggressions such as trespassing or violence. Libertarians favor an ethic of self-responsibility and strongly oppose the [[welfare state]], because they believe ''forcing'' someone to provide aid to others is ethically wrong, ultimately counter-productive, or both.
Line 113: Line 113:
[[Image:2d_political_spectrum.png|thumb|While the traditional political spectrum is a line, the [[Nolan chart]] turns it to a plane to situate libertarianism in a wider gamut of political thought.]]The related case of discrimination in the workplace is perhaps even more illuminating. Here, liberals would typically support laws to penalize employers for discrimination on a basis unrelated to the ability to do the job, conservatives would typically allow such discrimination, but libertarians could be expected to oppose any laws on this matter because these would infringe on the property rights of both the business owner and the justly-hired employees.  In other words, even if a particular libertarian feels strongly that various groups being discriminated against should have equality, he would say that intervening to establish this equality should not be the role of the government, but that of society. If a business discriminates against you, you are free to work elsewhere, or possibly start your own business which follows your personal belief structure, or lead a boycott or publicity campaign against the business. The libertarian's ability to distinguish between equality and freedom in this instance demonstrates their belief that equality of position is not a necessary condition of freedom, especially the freedom to enter into agreements in an un-coerced manner.  By endorsing such things as the freedom to discriminate, libertarianism supports freedom of association which is the foundation of human rights.
[[Image:2d_political_spectrum.png|thumb|While the traditional political spectrum is a line, the [[Nolan chart]] turns it to a plane to situate libertarianism in a wider gamut of political thought.]]The related case of discrimination in the workplace is perhaps even more illuminating. Here, liberals would typically support laws to penalize employers for discrimination on a basis unrelated to the ability to do the job, conservatives would typically allow such discrimination, but libertarians could be expected to oppose any laws on this matter because these would infringe on the property rights of both the business owner and the justly-hired employees.  In other words, even if a particular libertarian feels strongly that various groups being discriminated against should have equality, he would say that intervening to establish this equality should not be the role of the government, but that of society. If a business discriminates against you, you are free to work elsewhere, or possibly start your own business which follows your personal belief structure, or lead a boycott or publicity campaign against the business. The libertarian's ability to distinguish between equality and freedom in this instance demonstrates their belief that equality of position is not a necessary condition of freedom, especially the freedom to enter into agreements in an un-coerced manner.  By endorsing such things as the freedom to discriminate, libertarianism supports freedom of association which is the foundation of human rights.


Instead of a "left-right" spectrum, some libertarians use a two-dimensional space, with "personal freedom" on one axis and "economic freedom" on the other, which is called the [[Nolan chart]]. Named after [[David Nolan]], who designed the chart and also founded the [[Libertarian Party (United States)|United States Libertarian Party]], the chart is similar to a socio-political test used to place individuals by the [[Advocates for Self Government]]. A first approximation of libertarian politics (derived from these charts) is that they agree with liberals on social issues and with conservatives on economic issues. Thus, the traditional linear scale of governmental philosophy could be represented inside the chart stretching from the upper left corner to the lower right, while the degree of state control is represented linearly from the lower left to the upper right. (See below for criticism of this chart and its use.)
Instead of a "left-right" spectrum, some libertarians use a two-dimensional space, with "personal freedom" on one axis and "economic freedom" on the other, which is called the [[Nolan chart]]. Named after [[David Nolan]], who designed the chart and also founded the [[Libertarian Party]], the chart is similar to a socio-political test used to place individuals by the [[Advocates for Self Government]]. A first approximation of libertarian politics (derived from these charts) is that they agree with liberals on social issues and with conservatives on economic issues. Thus, the traditional linear scale of governmental philosophy could be represented inside the chart stretching from the upper left corner to the lower right, while the degree of state control is represented linearly from the lower left to the upper right. (See below for criticism of this chart and its use.)


== The libertarian movement ==
== The libertarian movement ==
Line 120: Line 120:
Some, such as [[David Boaz]], executive vice president of the libertarian U.S think tank, the [[Cato Institute]], argue that the term ''classical liberalism'' should be reserved for early liberal thinkers for the sake of clarity and accuracy, and because of differences between many libertarian and classical liberal thinkers. Nevertheless, the Cato Institute's official stance is that classical liberalism and libertarianism are synonymous; they prefer the term "liberal" to describe themselves, but choose not to use it because of its confusing connotation in some English-speaking countries (most self-described liberals prefer a [[mixed economy]] rather than a free market economy). The Cato Institute dislikes adding "classical" because, in their view, "the word 'classical' connotes a backward-looking philosophy". Thus, they finally settle on "libertarian", as it avoids backward implications and confused definitions.
Some, such as [[David Boaz]], executive vice president of the libertarian U.S think tank, the [[Cato Institute]], argue that the term ''classical liberalism'' should be reserved for early liberal thinkers for the sake of clarity and accuracy, and because of differences between many libertarian and classical liberal thinkers. Nevertheless, the Cato Institute's official stance is that classical liberalism and libertarianism are synonymous; they prefer the term "liberal" to describe themselves, but choose not to use it because of its confusing connotation in some English-speaking countries (most self-described liberals prefer a [[mixed economy]] rather than a free market economy). The Cato Institute dislikes adding "classical" because, in their view, "the word 'classical' connotes a backward-looking philosophy". Thus, they finally settle on "libertarian", as it avoids backward implications and confused definitions.


Libertarians and their allies are not a homogeneous group, but have collaborated to form [[think tank]]s, political parties, and other projects. For example, Austrian School economist [[Murray Rothbard]] co-founded the [[John Randolph Club]], the [[Center for Libertarian Studies]], and the [[Cato Institute]] to support an independent libertarian movement, and joined [[David Nolan]] in founding the [[United States Libertarian Party]] in 1971. (Rothbard ceased activity with the Libertarian Party in 1985 and some of his followers like [[Lew Rockwell]] are hostile to the group.) In the U.S. today, some libertarians support the Libertarian Party, some support no party, and some attempt to work within more powerful parties despite their differences. The [[Republican Liberty Caucus]] (a wing of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]]) promotes libertarian views. A similar organization, the [[Democratic Freedom Caucus]], exists within the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]], but is less organized. Republican Congressman [[Ron Paul]] is also a member of the Libertarian Party and was once its presidential candidate.
Libertarians and their allies are not a homogeneous group, but have collaborated to form [[think tank]]s, political parties, and other projects. For example, Austrian School economist [[Murray Rothbard]] co-founded the [[John Randolph Club]], the [[Center for Libertarian Studies]], and the [[Cato Institute]] to support an independent libertarian movement, and joined [[David Nolan]] in founding the [[Libertarian Party]] in 1971. (Rothbard ceased activity with the Libertarian Party in 1985 and some of his followers like [[Lew Rockwell]] are hostile to the group.) In the U.S. today, some libertarians support the Libertarian Party, some support no party, and some attempt to work within more powerful parties despite their differences. The [[Republican Liberty Caucus]] (a wing of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]]) promotes libertarian views. A similar organization, the [[Democratic Freedom Caucus]], exists within the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]], but is less organized. Republican Congressman [[Ron Paul]] is also a member of the Libertarian Party and was once its presidential candidate.


[[Image:Movimiento Libertario Logo.gif|left|frame|The [[Movimiento Libertario]] is one of the most successful libertarian political parties in the world.]][[Costa Rica]]'s [[Movimiento Libertario]] (Libertarian Movement) is a prominent, non-U.S. libertarian party which holds roughly 10% of the seats in Costa Rica's national assembly (legislature). The Movimiento Libertario is considered the first libertarian organization to achieve substantial electoral success at the national level, though not without controversy. For example, Rigoberto Stewart, co-founder of the party and founder of "The Limón REAL Project" [http://www.limonreal.com] for autonomy in a province in Costa Rica, and director of INLAP[http://www.inlap.org/en/], a libertarian think tank, lost his influence within Movimiento Libertario and support for "The Limón REAL Project". As perhaps explained by [[Public Choice Theory]], while accepting money from the [[Friedrich Naumann Foundation]], a [[Germany|German]] liberal foundation, the party compromised on their libertarian principles in return for more power, turning to anti-libertarian positions. [http://www.sunnimaravillosa.com/archives/00000384.html]
[[Image:Movimiento Libertario Logo.gif|left|frame|The [[Movimiento Libertario]] is one of the most successful libertarian political parties in the world.]][[Costa Rica]]'s [[Movimiento Libertario]] (Libertarian Movement) is a prominent, non-U.S. libertarian party which holds roughly 10% of the seats in Costa Rica's national assembly (legislature). The Movimiento Libertario is considered the first libertarian organization to achieve substantial electoral success at the national level, though not without controversy. For example, Rigoberto Stewart, co-founder of the party and founder of "The Limón REAL Project" [http://www.limonreal.com] for autonomy in a province in Costa Rica, and director of INLAP[http://www.inlap.org/en/], a libertarian think tank, lost his influence within Movimiento Libertario and support for "The Limón REAL Project". As perhaps explained by [[Public Choice Theory]], while accepting money from the [[Friedrich Naumann Foundation]], a [[Germany|German]] liberal foundation, the party compromised on their libertarian principles in return for more power, turning to anti-libertarian positions. [http://www.sunnimaravillosa.com/archives/00000384.html]

Navigation menu