55,996
edits
Judicial Committee (2020-2022): Difference between revisions
Judicial Committee (2020-2022) (view source)
Revision as of 13:29, 26 October 2021
, 26 October 2021→In re: The Suspension of LNC Secretary Caryn Ann Harlos
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
At the hearing, Judicial Committee Chair [[Mary Ruwart]] strongly urged the parties to resolve this between themselves prior to a ruling. To that end, immediately after the hearing [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] contacted [[Whitney Bilyeu]] but did not receive a response. Due to the short time frame, and presuming Ms. Bilyeu was tied up in other matters, Ms. Harlos approached other LNC members, notably [[Steven Nekhaila]] to work out proposed language for a compromise. | At the hearing, Judicial Committee Chair [[Mary Ruwart]] strongly urged the parties to resolve this between themselves prior to a ruling. To that end, immediately after the hearing [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] contacted [[Whitney Bilyeu]] but did not receive a response. Due to the short time frame, and presuming Ms. Bilyeu was tied up in other matters, Ms. Harlos approached other LNC members, notably [[Steven Nekhaila]] to work out proposed language for a compromise. | ||
===Request for Settlement Prior to Ruling=== | |||
Judicial Committee Chair [[Mary Ruwart]] with great feeling asked the parties to resolve this between themselves prior to the JC releasing a decision. To that end, [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] wrote to Party chair [[Whitney Bilyeu]] right as the hearing ended and did not receive a response. She then reached out to [[Steven Nekhaila]], [[Rich Bowen]], [[Erik Raudsep]], [[Joshua Smith]], [[Dustin Nannan]], and [[Ken Moellman]] and hammered out a compromise motion which was presented to the LNC. It was ruled out of order multiple times for procedural reasons with people disagreeing on whether or not the reasons were sound or designed to kill the motions. [[Susan Hogarth]] raised a point of order the first time the motions were presented but did not re-submit the point of order on subsequent introductions. [[Caryn Ann Harlos]] and the LNC sponsors have made it clear that the compromise motions were made due to the Ruwart request and for the good of the Party. You can view the LNC discussion threads with the language of the proposed motions as they evolved and the debates [https://groups.google.com/a/lp.org/g/lnc-business/c/SL8nsKPn-FA/m/itRZ6-MSEgAJ here]. The last iteration is waiting full sponsorship. The Judicial Committee has stated it will release its decision on November 13, 2021 if a settlement is not reached by November 12, 2021. | |||
ommm | |||
===Representing the Petitioner=== | ===Representing the Petitioner=== | ||