155
edits
(Editorial page?) |
(→Editorial page?: add factoid) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Such an article could list a number of such controversies over the years. The attacks have been used as excuses to dilute the platform, of course. Which is what makes article editorial. | Such an article could list a number of such controversies over the years. The attacks have been used as excuses to dilute the platform, of course. Which is what makes article editorial. | ||
See the only other article in [[Category:Libertarian Party Platform]] - [[Platform In Media]] - could use some positive examples of the use, which any accurate summary of most of the planks/positions is. (Except some pro-state action or pandering stuff that's snuck into the platform over the years. [[User:LP-1979|LP-1979]] ([[User talk:LP-1979|talk]]) 08:04, 19 May 2020 (CDT) | See the only other article in [[Category:Libertarian Party Platform]] - [[Platform In Media]] - could use some positive examples of the use, which any accurate summary of most of the planks/positions is. (Except some pro-state action or pandering stuff that's snuck into the platform over the years. | ||
In [[Category:National_Party_Platforms]] I found [[Development of the Libertarian Party Platform]] which could be beefed up to include various "dilution controversies" since it usually was controversial when big changes were made. [[User:LP-1979|LP-1979]] ([[User talk:LP-1979|talk]]) 08:04, 19 May 2020 (CDT) |
edits