55,996
edits
User talk:CarynAnnHarlos: Difference between revisions
→1, 2
No edit summary |
(→1, 2) |
||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
[[User:AJPEG|AJPEG]] ([[User talk:AJPEG|talk]]) 02:49, 6 October 2019 (CDT) | [[User:AJPEG|AJPEG]] ([[User talk:AJPEG|talk]]) 02:49, 6 October 2019 (CDT) | ||
::There were already several similar articles of similar names with either elected or officeholders. I am not at all sure what your objection is - is it just that there are no terms listed? If it is an article by year then the relevant information is that year, not the whole term, and the actual terms should be listed on the candidates page itself - also when a term ends for someone who spanned multiple years, the maintenance could be extensive as numerous pages would need to be edited, though more likely some would be and some would not be. All of the same information is there, minus terms. The important issue is Libertarians in office, whether elected or appointed.... or perhaps I am just not at all understanding the objection. It does seem though that a note or template stating that the lists may be incomplete is also needed. [[User:CarynAnnHarlos|CarynAnnHarlos]] ([[User talk:CarynAnnHarlos|talk]]) 04:10, 6 October 2019 (CDT) | :: 1. It is the style usage here to use ascending chronologically. We do that for consistency. And no, we don't try to put things in a way that have a more positive spin, though I don't agree that other even serves that purpose. This is a historical archive, no one is fooled by switching order of dates, and it is fully logical to have less at the beginning when the Party is brand new. The 2000 to 2008 was just a typo. I did not intend to change the year. All declared candidates get listed and would qualify for pages. You can certainly add a comment about reputation etc. If you would like the committee to review the uses of the platform to attack the LP for deletion you can put in a request for deletion. It is a factual piece and contains relevant information - it does no good to bury how we might be attacked but rather to be aware so as to combat it. I did not create that page so I do not know the entire intent. | ||
::2. There were already several similar articles of similar names with either elected or officeholders. I am not at all sure what your objection is - is it just that there are no terms listed? If it is an article by year then the relevant information is that year, not the whole term, and the actual terms should be listed on the candidates page itself - also when a term ends for someone who spanned multiple years, the maintenance could be extensive as numerous pages would need to be edited, though more likely some would be and some would not be. All of the same information is there, minus terms. The important issue is Libertarians in office, whether elected or appointed.... or perhaps I am just not at all understanding the objection. It does seem though that a note or template stating that the lists may be incomplete is also needed. | |||
The committee meetings are open and you are welcome to attend - let me know if you would like the log-in information. | |||
[[User:CarynAnnHarlos|CarynAnnHarlos]] ([[User talk:CarynAnnHarlos|talk]]) 04:10, 6 October 2019 (CDT) | |||