Paul Grant: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
'''Paul Grant''' was chair of the [[Libertarian National Committee]] from [[1983]] to [[1985]].
'''Paul Grant''' was chair of the [[Libertarian National Committee]] from [[1983]] to [[1985]].


Paul Grant first became active in the LP in [[1976]] when he collected petition signatures in Rochester, New York, for Roger MacBride's presidential campaign.
==Biography==
Grant first became active in the LP in [[1976]] when he collected petition signatures in Rochester, New York, for Roger MacBride's presidential campaign.


He moved from Rochester to Louisiana and served as the Louisiana State Chair from [[1978]]-[[1979]], at which time he was elected as a Regional Representative to the Libertarian National Committee.
He moved from Rochester to Louisiana and served as the Louisiana State Chair from [[1978]]-[[1979]], at which time he was elected as a Regional Representative to the Libertarian National Committee.
Line 44: Line 45:
Also in the early 1980's, Paul and Brian Erickson formed a free market organization, Coloradans for Free Enterprise (CFE), to bring creative speakers to Colorado to meet with those interested in discussing and learning how to apply free market improvements to government-impeded economic activities. In addition to bringing interesting speakers to Denver-area audiences, CFE in 1984 organized a statewide citizen initiative campaign to free Colorado’s transportation industry from control by the Public Utility Commission. Although they were unsuccessful in placing their initiative on the ballot, they were successful in challenging Colorado’s law which made it a felony to pay petition circulators.  They took their challenge all the way to the United States Supreme Court, where they won a unanimous (9-0) decision [Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414 (1988)], in which the Supreme Court held that petition advocacy was core political speech protected by the First Amendment and that the law prohibiting paid petitioning penalized political speech and, therefore, violated the First Amendment.  This ruling has helped inspire and empower the citizen initiative movement in those states which allow the initiative process, and led to such paid petition citizen initiative successes as legalized marijuana in Washington and Colorado, legalized gambling in Colorado, and many others.
Also in the early 1980's, Paul and Brian Erickson formed a free market organization, Coloradans for Free Enterprise (CFE), to bring creative speakers to Colorado to meet with those interested in discussing and learning how to apply free market improvements to government-impeded economic activities. In addition to bringing interesting speakers to Denver-area audiences, CFE in 1984 organized a statewide citizen initiative campaign to free Colorado’s transportation industry from control by the Public Utility Commission. Although they were unsuccessful in placing their initiative on the ballot, they were successful in challenging Colorado’s law which made it a felony to pay petition circulators.  They took their challenge all the way to the United States Supreme Court, where they won a unanimous (9-0) decision [Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414 (1988)], in which the Supreme Court held that petition advocacy was core political speech protected by the First Amendment and that the law prohibiting paid petitioning penalized political speech and, therefore, violated the First Amendment.  This ruling has helped inspire and empower the citizen initiative movement in those states which allow the initiative process, and led to such paid petition citizen initiative successes as legalized marijuana in Washington and Colorado, legalized gambling in Colorado, and many others.


Paul served as Chairman of the [[Libertarian National Committee]] from 1983-1985, after which he married, raised a family, and stepped back from political activity.  
Grant served as Chairman of the [[Libertarian National Committee]] from 1983-1985, after which he married, raised a family, and stepped back from political activity.  


But Paul continued to champion liberty, earning a law degree and then taking on arbitrary state power in Colorado and federal courts, where he has brought numerous successful challenges to state election laws regulating citizen initiatives and third party candidates.  He has also successfully - and sometimes unsuccessfully - defended the criminally accused, in state and federal trials and appeals. Some of his cases have gained national attention, such as his successful defense (on appeal, after losing the trial to a single judge, where a jury was not allowed) of juror Laura Kriho, who was charged with and convicted of contempt of court for freely expressing her thoughts in the jury room. Paul won most of his jury trials, and many appeals, but determined that he would no longer earn his living as a lawyer because he was no longer willing to pretend that the criminal legal system worked.   
But Grant continued to champion liberty, earning a law degree and then taking on arbitrary state power in Colorado and federal courts, where he has brought numerous successful challenges to state election laws regulating citizen initiatives and third party candidates.  He has also successfully - and sometimes unsuccessfully - defended the criminally accused, in state and federal trials and appeals. Some of his cases have gained national attention, such as his successful defense (on appeal, after losing the trial to a single judge, where a jury was not allowed) of juror Laura Kriho, who was charged with and convicted of contempt of court for freely expressing her thoughts in the jury room. Paul won most of his jury trials, and many appeals, but determined that he would no longer earn his living as a lawyer because he was no longer willing to pretend that the criminal legal system worked.   
   
   
By 2011, Paul curtailed his full-time law practice, and he now spends much of his time working in a different field.  He is still willing to step back into the legal arena from time to time, in difficult and challenging cases, to protect the liberty interests of his clients against an oppressive state. Paul is also working on a book with many chapters, with each chapter devoted to a horror story from his experiences in the legal system.
By 2011, Paul curtailed his full-time law practice, and he now spends much of his time working in a different field.  He is still willing to step back into the legal arena from time to time, in difficult and challenging cases, to protect the liberty interests of his clients against an oppressive state. Paul is also working on a book with many chapters, with each chapter devoted to a horror story from his experiences in the legal system.


{{start box}}
{{start box}}
Line 58: Line 58:
}}
}}
{{end box}}
{{end box}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Grant, Paul}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Grant, Paul}}