LPedia:Disputed or Controversial Material: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Categorization) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There are some subjects about which is there current or former controversy. If it is in a factual recitation of events, the presentation should present the strongest and most unbiased information from the different perspectives. And if in an ideological interpretation, the presentation should avoid debate or contention but be presented in an even-handed manner preferably referring to published official documents of the Party in primary support. At the discretion of the Administrators, the topic may be marked as controversial or with a similar disclaimer. | There are some subjects about which is there current or former controversy. If it is in a factual recitation of events, the presentation should present the strongest and most unbiased information from the different perspectives. And if in an ideological interpretation, the presentation should avoid debate or contention but be presented in an even-handed manner preferably referring to published official documents of the Party in primary support. At the discretion of the Administrators, the topic may be marked as controversial or with a similar disclaimer. | ||
A notice similar to this may be placed into such content: | |||
LPedia is an archive and takes no sides. When adding information to this page, please disclose items that that are not clearly disinterested unless it is obvious from the content. Please keep the article limited to actual events, players, and documents. While the personal opinions of members may be contained in documents and their own narratives, please refrain from putting praise or slurs into the main article content. Readers can read the documents and outside commentary and arrive at their own conclusions. If you wish to state a very subjective analysis, host the analysis elsewhere and list it as a reference link or document here. Thank you for respecting the purpose of LPedia. | |||
[[Category:Policies]] | [[Category:Policies]] |
Revision as of 18:45, 23 November 2021
There are some subjects about which is there current or former controversy. If it is in a factual recitation of events, the presentation should present the strongest and most unbiased information from the different perspectives. And if in an ideological interpretation, the presentation should avoid debate or contention but be presented in an even-handed manner preferably referring to published official documents of the Party in primary support. At the discretion of the Administrators, the topic may be marked as controversial or with a similar disclaimer.
A notice similar to this may be placed into such content:
LPedia is an archive and takes no sides. When adding information to this page, please disclose items that that are not clearly disinterested unless it is obvious from the content. Please keep the article limited to actual events, players, and documents. While the personal opinions of members may be contained in documents and their own narratives, please refrain from putting praise or slurs into the main article content. Readers can read the documents and outside commentary and arrive at their own conclusions. If you wish to state a very subjective analysis, host the analysis elsewhere and list it as a reference link or document here. Thank you for respecting the purpose of LPedia.