User talk:AMK152: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Sorry for the delay in responding. I just put together [[LPedia:Historical Categories|this page]] if it's of any immediate help. -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] ([[User talk:Strangelv|talk]]) 15:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | ::Sorry for the delay in responding. I just put together [[LPedia:Historical Categories|this page]] if it's of any immediate help. -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] ([[User talk:Strangelv|talk]]) 15:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::How is the issue with the categories not showing up coming along? [[User:AMK152|AMK152]] ([[User talk:AMK152|talk]]) 20:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | :::How is the issue with the categories not showing up coming along? [[User:AMK152|AMK152]] ([[User talk:AMK152|talk]]) 20:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
You have been kicking ass. | |||
[[User:CarynAnnHarlos|CarynAnnHarlos]] ([[User talk:CarynAnnHarlos|talk]]) 02:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:05, 11 May 2017
Categories
I'm trying to figure out some of the categories you've created. They seem to mostly duplicate other categories that we already have. I'm unsure about having a National Affiliates category in addition to a State Parties category, for example.
Admittedly, tinkering on categories is kind of problematic when we can't see what's been added to them since January... Hopefully that will be fixed soon. -- Strangelv (talk) 09:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- We would need to establish category naming conventions. A national affiliate category would categorize all national parties, but having a state party's category should categorize the 51 U.S. state parties (like on Wikipedia). I don't think they should be combined. 13:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
You have been kicking ass.
CarynAnnHarlos (talk) 02:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)