Talk:Uses Of Platform To Attack LP: Difference between revisions
(Editorial page?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Editorial page?= | ==Editorial page?== | ||
While the list of attacks may be factual, I think a counter page could be created: "History of dilution of the LP platform" or something. | While the list of attacks may be factual, I think a counter page could be created: "History of dilution of the LP platform" or something. | ||
Such an article could list a number of such controversies over the years. The attacks have been used as excuses to dilute the platform, of course. Which is what makes article editorial. | Such an article could list a number of such controversies over the years. The attacks have been used as excuses to dilute the platform, of course. Which is what makes article editorial. | ||
See the only other article in [[Category:Libertarian Party Platform]] - [[Platform In Media]] - could use some positive examples of the use, which any accurate summary of most of the planks/positions is. (Except some pro-state action or pandering stuff that's snuck into the platform over the years. [[User:LP-1979|LP-1979]] ([[User talk:LP-1979|talk]]) 08:04, 19 May 2020 (CDT) | See the only other article in [[Category:Libertarian Party Platform]] - [[Platform In Media]] - could use some positive examples of the use, which any accurate summary of most of the planks/positions is. (Except some pro-state action or pandering stuff that's snuck into the platform over the years. | ||
In [[Category:National_Party_Platforms]] I found [[Development of the Libertarian Party Platform]] which could be beefed up to include various "dilution controversies" since it usually was controversial when big changes were made. [[User:LP-1979|LP-1979]] ([[User talk:LP-1979|talk]]) 08:04, 19 May 2020 (CDT) | |||
:It might also be of value to note that such attacks are one way of getting our message out there, albeit by unfriendly courriers. Gee, those irresponsibly insane Libertarians want to legalize... well, everything Oregon just legalized earlier this month... -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] ([[User talk:Strangelv|talk]]) 08:41, 11 November 2020 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:41, 11 November 2020
Editorial page?
While the list of attacks may be factual, I think a counter page could be created: "History of dilution of the LP platform" or something.
Such an article could list a number of such controversies over the years. The attacks have been used as excuses to dilute the platform, of course. Which is what makes article editorial.
See the only other article in - Platform In Media - could use some positive examples of the use, which any accurate summary of most of the planks/positions is. (Except some pro-state action or pandering stuff that's snuck into the platform over the years.
In I found Development of the Libertarian Party Platform which could be beefed up to include various "dilution controversies" since it usually was controversial when big changes were made. LP-1979 (talk) 08:04, 19 May 2020 (CDT)
- It might also be of value to note that such attacks are one way of getting our message out there, albeit by unfriendly courriers. Gee, those irresponsibly insane Libertarians want to legalize... well, everything Oregon just legalized earlier this month... -- Strangelv (talk) 08:41, 11 November 2020 (CST)