Talk:Dallas Accord: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision imported: Importing changes from 1Q2017 temporary/test site) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:CarynAnn.Harlos|CarynAnn.Harlos]] ([[User talk:CarynAnn.Harlos|talk]]) | [[User:CarynAnn.Harlos|CarynAnn.Harlos]] ([[User talk:CarynAnn.Harlos|talk]]) | ||
Updated article with results of my historical research | |||
[[User:CarynHarlos|CarynHarlos]] ([[User talk:CarynHarlos|talk]]) | |||
The internal links need to be updated with specific links to the planks mentioned - that takes a bit more work. | |||
[[User:CarynAnnHarlos|CarynAnnHarlos]] ([[User talk:CarynAnnHarlos|talk]]) 15:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
In discussions it was found that there was some public confusion as to whether or not the Accord meant that no members could even bring up the issues until only the minimal state existed. Since the original participants before and after always continued their personal debates and the statements were construed as the Platform planks (no Bylaws change was made to be binding on members), it is apparent that such was not the intent, nor is it at all plausible the the *Libertarian Party* would put a gag order on members. So that statement was clarified. [[User:CarynAnnHarlos|CarynAnnHarlos]] ([[User talk:CarynAnnHarlos|talk]]) 22:37, 4 November 2017 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:37, 5 November 2017
This article is completely inaccurate.. needs updating. Anyone wish to work on it with me?
Updated article with results of my historical research
The internal links need to be updated with specific links to the planks mentioned - that takes a bit more work.
CarynAnnHarlos (talk) 15:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
In discussions it was found that there was some public confusion as to whether or not the Accord meant that no members could even bring up the issues until only the minimal state existed. Since the original participants before and after always continued their personal debates and the statements were construed as the Platform planks (no Bylaws change was made to be binding on members), it is apparent that such was not the intent, nor is it at all plausible the the *Libertarian Party* would put a gag order on members. So that statement was clarified. CarynAnnHarlos (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2017 (CDT)